ICWG June 2006 NOTES from the FORUM on STANDARD CANDLES Date : 15 June 2006 Participants : Plenary Session REPORT ON STANDARD CANDLES WORKING SESSION ------------------------------------------ Haberl summarised the discussion of the Standard Candles Working Session. Refer to the minutes of the Working Session for details. During this forum the list of candidate standard candle sources compiled during the Working Session was augmented by the addition of the isolated neutron star PSR0656 and the supernova remnants PSR1509 and 0540-69. These have consequently been added to the list of candidate standard candles recorded in the minutes of the Working Session. H. Marshall asked about the usage of stars as line standards. R. Smith urged the consideration of Procyon as a key source extending calibration beyond 30 Angstrom. The matter of stellar line standards had been discussed in the Working Session and it had been decided that such standards fell outside the scope of the standrad candles session, belonging more in the session on calibration sources in general. U. Briel remarked that all the candidate standard candles listed were potentially too bright for future missions, like Xeus, for example. It was remarked that one possible way to deal with this situation might be to have a "grey filter", a "pinhole", that could allow a controlled attenuation of such sources. Kaastra remarked that Xeus can be defocussed, which might offer one means of attenuating flux peaks. Smith replied that Chandra can also be defocussed, but it is not something that would be done routinely, or indeed ever! Rothschild remarked on the desirability of finding other sources going up to higher energies. It was asked whether the ICWG should advocate regular observation of the identified set of targets by the various missions. The minutes of the Working Session record the usage of these targets by the missions represented at the session. U. Briel remarked that all the candidate standard candles listed were potentially too bright for future missions, like Xeus, for example. It was remarked that one possible way to deal with this situation might be to have a "grey filter", a "pinhole", that could allow a controlled attenuation of such sources. Kaastra remarked that Xeus can be defocussed, which might offer one means of attenuating flux peaks. Smith replied that Chandra can also be defocussed, but it is not something that would be done routinely, or indeed ever! Rothschild remarked on the desirability of finding other sources going up to higher energies. It was asked whether the ICWG should advocate regular observation of the identified set of targets by the various missions. The minutes of the Working Session (above) record the usage of these targets by the missions represented at the session.