RGS spectrum of HR1099
Home Watchouts Software requirements Installation Download Documentation Calibration Help

Can I estimate the pile-up level in my observation?

Pile-up (the accumulation of more than one photon in the same pixel or in neighboring pixels during the time a CCD frame is exposed) can lead to flux losses and spectral distortion. It is very important to estimate the pile-up fraction in your own data, before you perform any spectral analysis. Pile-up fractions lower than 5% have normally a negligible impact on the spectral results.

Within SAS, a tool is available to check the pile-up fraction in the pn data: epatplot. This tool compares the observed pattern distributions (derived from a pn calibrated and concatenated even list) with the calibrated models. The latter are instrument mode dependent.

An example of the epatplot output (as in the SASv5.3 implementation) is shown in Fig.1


Fig.1: the SAS v5.3 epatplot output in the case of a strong pile-uped source

The upper panel shows the energy spectra. Different colors correspond to different pattern choices: singles (red), doubles (blue), triples (green), quadruples (ultramarine). The lower panel is the key element for the evaluation of the pile-up fraction: it shows the observed distribution of pattern as a function of energy (PI channel in Analog-Digital Units), using the same color code. A continuous line, superimposed to the histograms, represents the expected distribution. In the example above, the remarkable difference between observation and model indicate that the pn data are substantially affected by pile-up along the whole on energy bandpass.

The only way to reduce pile-up in a given dataset is to excise the core of the PSF, up to a radius where the pile-up fraction becomes negligible. The effect of a 4 arc-minutes excision on the same observation is shown in Fig.2. The agreement between observed and theoretical distribution is much better. Spectra extracted from annuli around the source, excluding the innermost 4' are pile-up free.


Fig.2: the same as Fig.1, if 4' around the PSF core are excised.

The user must be aware that differences between the observed and expected pile-up distribution can occur both in the softest and hardest energy band, due to the effects unrelated to pile-up:

As a baseline, the user shall use in a spectrum accumulation events selected in an energy range where the agreement between the observed and the theoretical pattern distribution is good, no matter what the origin of the deviation is. The users are recommended to test several extraction radii, to find the best compromise between signal-to-noise ratio and pile-up minimization in their own data.

Two more caveats shall be born in mind:



Pages maintained by SAS librarian.
Any question about SAS should be addressed to the XMM-Newton help desk.

Updated on: November 18, 2006